Showing posts with label IP Writers. Show all posts
Showing posts with label IP Writers. Show all posts

Monday, March 6, 2017

Illegal Wildlife Trade

Illegal wildlife trade is estimated to be a multibillion-dollar business, making it the fourth most lucrative illegal trade in the world; it ranks right after drugs, human trafficking and the arms trade. This trade generates between $5-100 billion annually.  Deeply disturbed, it consists on the sell or exchange of wild animals and plant resources with the purpose of obtaining leather goods or souvenirs, traditional medicine and luxury’s. Endangered animals and plants are often the target of wildlife crime because of their rarity and increased economic value, causing the extension of many species. China, Thailand, India, Asia and Africa play key roles in the trade network. The USA and the UK are also participants, we are able to observe that they are ranked near the bottom. The countries in favor of this trade are down for it because of their cultures, thinking that it’s a way of paying tribute to their souls; however, as the time passed, they realized that they could gain a good amount of money, which helps them grow their economy. The income of this illegal trade became the only resource for many countries that are involved too. The wildlife trade has been around for 40 years, it started in Africa and Asia. Profits from wildlife trafficking benefit criminal syndicates and terrorist organizations, promote corruption and erode good governance. The illegal timber trade generates billions of dollars, creating enormous economic distortions in global wood markets. Viewing with appreciation, many countries have donated a good sum of money to end this trade; countries like Canada, Germany, UK, Botswana, and many more. Each country that is against the wildlife trade, supports campaigns and companies who are in charge of fighting for the rights of these species.



Recognizing that not all wildlife trade is illegal and not always a problem, we still need to contemplate the consequences of the animal losses. Populations of species on earth have declined by an average 40% between 1970 and 2000. Keeping in mind wildlife trade can cause overexploitation, to the point where the survival of a species hangs in the balance. Illegal trade in wildlife abuses the poorest populations and weakens government authority by compromising the rule of law. The existence of illegal trade is also worrying because it undermines countries' efforts to protect their natural resources. Convinced, the countries of Canada, Mexico, USA, New Zeeland, Australia, and many others, have always been against this trade from the very begging, while Asia and Africa have also been in favor. Welcoming all of the campaigns and companies that have come together to the favor of the species, we can see the results. We see Uhuru Kenyattta President of Kenya, taking action towards poaching, by burning 6,000 elephant tusks in the Kenya National Wildlife Park. This decision was approached in the International wildlife trading meeting. Taking note of the problem the President says “The future of the African elephant and rhino is far from secure so long as demand for their products continues to exist,” Campaigns and companies such as, TRAFFIC, WWF, UNEA, IUCN, One Green Planet, Green Peace, etc. All of them with the same purpose; protect the species of the world. These companies has united with different countries like the UK, Canada, USA, Switzerland, Mexico, Kenya and a lot more.


-Kate Good. (2014). 10 Shocking Facts About How the Illegal Wildlife Trade Drives Species Extinction. 2017, de One Green Planet Sitio web: http://www.onegreenplanet.org/environment/shocking-facts-about-how-the-illegal-wildlife-trade-drives-species-extinction/
-Simon Milledge. (---). Positive and negative conservation and livelihood impacts of wildlife trade regulation in the East Usambara Mountains. 2017, de TRAFFIC Sitio web: http://www.tfcg.org/pdf/article_wildlife_trade.pdf
-Fiona Harvey. (2016). Kenya to burn biggest ever stockpile of ivory. 2017, de The Guardian Sitio web: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/apr/29/kenya-to-burn-biggest-ever-stockpile-of-ivory
-Peter Wilson. (2014). The London Declaration’s Role in the Fight Against Wildlife Trade. 2017, de UN Chronicle Sitio web: https://unchronicle.un.org/article/london-declaration-s-role-fight-against-wildlife-trade
-Justin Worland. (2015). These Countries Are At The Center of The Illegal Wildlife Trade. 2017, de TIME Sitio web: http://time.com/3921138/illegal-wildlife-trade-countries/
-Kaleigh Rogers. (2015). The Six Countries Keeping the Tiger Poaching Trade Alive. 2017, de Motherboard Sitio web: https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/the-six-countries-keeping-the-tiger-poaching-trade-alive

-Jani Actman. (2016). China to Shut Down Its Ivory Trade by the End of 2017. 2017, de National Geographic Sitio web: http://news.nationalgeographic.com/2016/12/wildlife-watch-china-legal-ivory-market-african-elephants/

 





Saturday, February 25, 2017

The Rise of Environmental Crime





The world is being in a stage of lack of its natural resources, with much of what nations depend for their healthy living, they are now at risk from a new threat: environmental crime.

Environmental crime is defined as any act, or attempted act, committed against the environment that violates defined laws. Emphasizing the most common of environmental crimes are chemical waste, ozone decrease, illegal caught of seafood, wood exploitation and other forest products, but the main crimes are mining, fishing and deforestation.

According to a report made by the UNEP that follows these cases reveals that this area of criminality has diversified to become the world’s fourth largest crime sector, growing at 2 to 3 times the pace of the global economy.
INTERPOL (International Criminal Police Organization) and UNEP now estimate that natural resources worth as much as 91 billion to 258 billion dollars that these criminals are stealing.
Organizations such as INTERPOL and the UNEP started to feel fully alarmed when they realized that this problem was increasing more and more everytime, so they began to fight this crime in 1992.

These are the solutions they purpose:

To reduce threats to security and peace, accept the information and share it across the sectors for the peacekeeping mission, in order to inform holistic responses towards securing peace, security and sustainable development.
The rule of law, the international community must recognize and approve the environmental crimes as a serious threat to peace and sustainable development, to prevent safe havens, improve legislation, implement dissuasive penalties, substantial sanctions and punishments.
 Leadership, governments should establish central coordination and national plans to combat the involvement of criminal organized groups in environmental crimes.

Financial support, declare to the international development community to recognize crime as a serious threat to sustainable development and strengthen the share of ODA (Official Development Assessment) to abolish and prevent environmental crime. This should be led to capacity building and technological support to relevant agencies.
Economic incentives and consumer awareness, to strengthen economic incentives, relevant institutions and awareness. Identifying best practices in behavioral change should be undertaken to reduce demand.

Global Background:

¿Why is this issue a conflict for the world?



Environmental crime endangers not only wildlife populations it also effects the ecosystems levels through massive deforestation, pollution from unregulated chemical use and disposal, and destruction of livelihoods. Confirming that it affects globally because nations depend from these natural resources and these actions make abrupt changes in the ecosystem that cause different reactions, such as water shortage, climate change, health diseases, loss of animal life, and oxygen.

Responding to environmental crime

Different needs must be recognized, and different tools are required depending on the environmental crime.
In the lasts decades, voluntary actions and awareness programs have been dominated by many efforts.

Approving over 99% of the billion dollars REDD (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation) programs and EU (European Unions) FLEGT (Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade.) have largely focused on voluntary agreements and NGO (Non Governmental Organizations) support. Programs such as ICCWC (International Consortium on Combating Wildlife Crime), INTERPOL or national enforcement and security sector reform have received comparatively modest support in spite of major successes. Combining the successes of programs such as REDD and ICCWC may lead to breakthroughs in approaches to natural resources management and stemming the tide of ITW.

Ministers from Russia and the group of seven leading economies agreed to step up their cooperation against environmental crime in 1998.

The meeting of environmental ministers from Britain, the United States, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Canada and Russia was held in advance of a gathering of national leaders in England.

 UNEP (2016). The Rise of Environmental Crime. Retrieved February, 2017, from http://web.unep.org/documents/itw/environmental_crimes.pdf
UNEP (2016). Rise of Environmental Crime. Retrieved February, 2017, from http://web.unep.org/documents/itw/eco_crime.pdf
The New York Times. 8 Countries Agree to Fight Environmental Crime. (1998, April 6). Retrieved February, 2017, from http://www.nytimes.com/1998/04/06/world/8-countries-agree-to-fight-environmental-crime.html
UNEP. (2015). Climate Change. Retrieved February, 2017, from http://web.unep.org/climatechange/adaptation/AccessToAdaptationFinance/UDASP/ListOfCountriesSupportedByUDASP.aspx
Environmental Research Paper. (2016). Retrieved February, 2017, from http://research-paper.essayempire.com/criminal-justice-research-paper/environmental-crime/
Environmental Crime. (2016). Retrieved February, 2017, from https://www.stimson.org/enviro-crime/